Le prospettive della salute sulla Montagna Pistoiese

Lunedì 6 dicembre si è tenuta una seduta congiunta dei consigli comunali di Abetobe Cutigliano e San Marcello Piteglio.

Ecco la sintesi di Simone Ferrari, che è anche neo-rappresentante della lista insieme a Leonardo Corsini nella Consulta della Salute.

𝘌̀ 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘢 𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘰 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰. 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦́ 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘪 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘪 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪 (𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰 𝘦 𝘗𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘪) 𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘮𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘛𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭 2013; 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 2017; 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘰 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰 2017 𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘪 𝘚𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘤𝘪 𝘴𝘪 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘨𝘯𝘪 𝘴𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰; 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰, 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘚𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪, 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦 𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢; 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘰, 𝘮𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪, 𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘭𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘙𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪; 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘧𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘗𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰, 𝘗𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘈𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰; 𝘥𝘪 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘶 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘪𝘢𝘻𝘻𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’ 𝘈𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘦 2018 𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘰 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘪 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘪𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪 𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪 8 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪. 𝘘𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘪 𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦.

𝘗𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰 𝘦̀ 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘭’𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘦! 𝘈 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 (𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭’𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘉𝘦𝘻𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢, 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦), 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘰, 𝘥𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘪 𝘤𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢. 𝘍𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘢 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘪 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘰 𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘙𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪 𝘦 𝘴𝘪 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦, 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘦, 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘜𝘚𝘊𝘈, 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭'𝘐𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘢, 𝘥𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘪 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢, 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 "𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘚𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦" 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 "𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀". 𝘛𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘢, 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘢 𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘵, 𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘤𝘰 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘦! 𝘗𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘰̀, 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰/𝘙𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘭 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘻𝘢 (𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭'𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘰 𝘴𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦́ 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘭'𝘩𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰) 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘢 𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘤'𝘦̀ 𝘦, 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘮𝘦, 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦, 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘰̀ 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘶𝘯 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘖𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰, 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘷𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘪 𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪. 𝘎𝘪𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰 𝘚𝘦𝘨𝘩𝘪 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘦̀ 𝘶𝘯 𝘗.𝘐.𝘖.𝘛. (𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘰 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘖𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘛𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘰) 𝘮𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘪 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘰 𝘶𝘯 𝘖𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘪 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘪 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘤𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘦̀ 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘦, 𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘰 𝘪𝘰, 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘦̀ 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘪 𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘩𝘪 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘰, 𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘪 𝘭𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘪 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰, 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦!

𝘓𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪? 𝘐 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪 𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰 𝘝𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪 𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰 𝘚𝘦𝘨𝘩𝘪 ! 𝘐𝘭 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 ... 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘋𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪 2 𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘰. 𝘗𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘢 𝘪 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪, 𝘯𝘦𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪 𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪 𝘯𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘢̀ 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘦, 𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘢̀ 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪. 𝘜𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘢… 𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘰 (𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰 𝘝𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪) 𝘩𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰, 𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘰 𝘩𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘙𝘖 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘪 𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘱𝘪𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘰!

Questo invece il “racconto” di Davide Costa

𝘕𝘦𝘭 𝘮𝘪𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘰 𝘮𝘪 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘭’𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘉𝘦𝘻𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢 𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢. 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦́ 𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘦̀ 𝘪𝘭 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 (𝘭’𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘦) 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘢, 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢 (𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘦𝘤𝘤…) 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘪𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘴𝘶 𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘢. 𝘈 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 (𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰) 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 (𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘦) 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢. 𝘊𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘢, 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘤𝘤… 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘦 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘶𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘤𝘰 𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢. 𝘔𝘢 𝘪𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘢, 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘰̀ 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦. 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘪 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰 (𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢) 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘻𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘦, 𝘰𝘷𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘪 𝘴𝘪 𝘦̀ 𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘪 𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘤𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪 𝘩𝘢.